When documenting vehicle and equipment authorizations on a licensing record or permit, which of the following practices is strictly prohibited by Army licensing regulations?

When documenting vehicle and equipment authorizations on a licensing record or permit, which of the following practices is strictly prohibited by Army licensing regulations?

• A. The use of generic series, family, or below (for example, M113 Family, Generators 200 kilowatt and below, Bus 90 pass and below, Backhoe-all models, or pintle towed trailer) is prohibited.
• B. The use of precise vehicle model numbers is prohibited.
• C. Using only paper records is prohibited.
• D. Using unique vehicle identifiers is prohibited.

Answer: (A)

In Army licensing records, each vehicle or piece of equipment must be identified exactly, so there’s no ambiguity about what is being licensed. Using broad generic designations like a whole family or series lumps together many different items, which can hide which exact asset is authorized and lead to mistakes in accountability, auditing, or reissuance of permits. That level of vagueness makes it impossible to confirm that the right item has the right authorization, which is why this practice is strictly prohibited. The proper approach is to document the precise model or the unique identifier for each asset, such as a specific model number and any serial or asset tag that ties the license to a definite item. This creates a clear, auditable link between the permit and the exact equipment. The other options describe practices that are not the prohibited one, and in practice the regulations rely on exact identifiers and detailed records rather than broad categories.

In Army licensing records, each vehicle or piece of equipment must be identified exactly, so there’s no ambiguity about what is being licensed. Using broad generic designations like a whole family or series lumps together many different items, which can hide which exact asset is authorized and lead to mistakes in accountability, auditing, or reissuance of permits. That level of vagueness makes it impossible to confirm that the right item has the right authorization, which is why this practice is strictly prohibited.

The proper approach is to document the precise model or the unique identifier for each asset, such as a specific model number and any serial or asset tag that ties the license to a definite item. This creates a clear, auditable link between the permit and the exact equipment.

The other options describe practices that are not the prohibited one, and in practice the regulations rely on exact identifiers and detailed records rather than broad categories.